You are viewing an unstyled version of this page.


Welcome to the Crustal Strain and Deformation EarthScope Thematic Working Group Community Pages. Non-registered visitors are allowed to view all entries, information, and comments submitted by registered members. Those wishing to join one or more TWG can utilize the 'Register' link at the top right to register as a member of this online community. Only registered members are allowed to post articles, information, and/or comments on articles submitted by other registered members.

Member Information

Co-Chairs:

David Sandwell, University of California San Diego
Roland Burgmann, University of California Berkeley


Join The Crustal Strain and Deformation Mailing List

Email:

Monthly Archives

Crustal Strain and Deformation TWG Entries

Crustal Strain and Deformation National Meeting Summary Report

Crustal Strain & Deformation Science
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 07/01 at 02:34 PM


Chairs:

Roland Burgmann (UC Berkeley)
David Sandwell (UC San Diego)
Sucker: Me (Matt Pritchard, Cornell University)

What we did:

  • Review 2002 plan

Brainstorm lists of:

  • 1) (Achievable) Big-picture science goals
  • 2) Potential workshop topics
  • 3) (Risky) Frontier science goals

Review of 2002 Science Plan: (2001 Snowbird Meeting Workshop Report)

EarthScopeʼs facilities include:

  • SAFOD (San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth
  • USArray (United States Seismic Array)
  • PBO (Plate Bound ary Observatory)
  • InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) - NASA Spacecraft proposal was not funded. NSF, NASA and USGS support the purchase of InSAR data from the European Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency.

InSAR: Earthscope’s missing leg

Three-legged chair, sculpture by David Ireland Why leg is missing is “mysterious” in the artwork and in Earthscope http://www.stretcher.org/archives/r5_a/2004_03_19_r5_archive.php)

Craig Dobson (NASA) reports:

  • NASA has an airborne InSAR that has data in hand from western U.S. sites
  • Potential DESDynI launch in 2015
  • Continued need for data from foreign assets


2002 Science Topics

  • 1) lithosphere rheology
  • 2) fault rheology
  • 3) stress in the lithosphere: absolute stress and how heterogeneous?
  • 4) transients in the lithosphere
  • 5) role of fluids in lithospheric stress (poroelastic)
  • 6) how do faults interact?
  • 7) impact of tectonic deformation on fluid flow in the crust


2009 Science Plan:

Big-picture ideas!

  • 1. What has been learned with EarthScope already opens up new questions
  • 2. Non-tectonic processes including glacial & hydrological phenomena tie to climate change and related processes
  • 3. Develop continuous deformation fields at high sampling rate for improved studies of transient deformation events. Motivation for real-time?
  • 4. Spatial density of strain fields is still lacking. More semi-continuous networks to densify coverage? More data from surveyors, etc. InSAR velocity field over all western-US. Improve knowledge of geologic deformation. More focal mechanisms.
  • 5. Spectrum of fault slip behavior deserves deeper, interdisciplinary exploration (from steady creep, episodic slow slip events to seismic slip).
  • 6. Role of compliant fault zones: How widespread? How many?
  • 7. Complementary data: More downhole instrumentation. Add gravity


2009 Science Plan:

"Frontier" ideas!

  • 1. Identify opportunities for Broader Impact, Education and Outreach efforts. (all)
  • 2. Improve vertical GPS sensitivity and relate to geodynamic processes LiDAR survey of whole US would be of interest. (26)
  • 3. Elastic vs. Permanent deformation! Geologic information, LiDAR, focal mechanisms, and conventional geodesy all needed. (25)
  • 4. Offshore geodesy - implications for fault mechanics, partitioning of deformation, seismic hazard, etc. (24)
  • 5. 4D Seismology & Strain: Time-dependent ambient noise. Accelerations in GPS velocity fields and annual cycles (24)
  • 6. Eastern US deformation: Many new topics (13)
  • 7. Why does the crust deform where and how it does? Heat flow, lithology, etc. (13)
  • 8. Global partnerships and integration world-wide. (8)
  • 9. Geodesy at depth vertical strain at depth. (5)
  • 10. Precursory processes, triggering mechanisms etc. (4)
  • 11. More Tiltmeters in tectonic regions (e.g., at GPS sites along SAF). (4)
  • 12. “Ambient noise geodesy” - small motions of sites (2)
  • 13. Foreshocks are common: Can we target moderate (M5) earthquakes often, given that 20% of them may turn out to be foreshocks? (4)
  • 14. Core strain from magnetic field. (1)


2009 Science Plan:

Thematic Workshop/Institute ideas!

  • 1. Velocity fields, strain maps and integration:
    • 1. Unifying all available campaign and continuous GPS data for comprehensive velocity field and time series products
    • 2. Comprehensive integration of GPS and InSAR
    • 3. Comparison of strain rate maps - separation of strain rate into elastic earthquake-cycle strain (steady and time dependent) and permanent strain rate
    • 4. Integration of strain rate models and 3-D structure from other Earthscope elements (anisotropy, tomography etc.)
  • 2. Spectrum of fault slip behavior: Observations and models of slip behaviors.
  • 3. Loading processes affecting vertical deformation: atmosphere, hydrology

Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to Crustal Strain and Deformation Home